Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Su Jeong Jang vs Aneta Kladivova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Kladivova analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Su Jeong Jang vs Aneta Kladivova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 0 - 0 Kladivova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 45.27% of points on their second serve, while Kladivova has won 43.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 52.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kladivova has won 58.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.06% and 44.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kladivova has saved 48.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 58.49% of matches played (W/L 31/ 22), with Kladivova winning 60.66% (W/L 37/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 75/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Kladivova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 132/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 29/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Kladivova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.34% of matches (W/L 35/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 237 while Kladivova has played against players with an average rank of 266.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kladivova has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 47.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kladivova has converted 47.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
232
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
436
Rank
358
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
60% (424-284)
Career Total W/L
59% (162-112)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$340,345
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Su Jeong Jang vs Aneta Kladivova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jang VS Kladivova
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Aneta Kladivova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/26) | 57% (37/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (364/291) | 54% (318/271) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 61% (11/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 55% (6/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 106 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:9 | 1:31:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.42 | 165.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1312/1904) | 63% (1140/1802) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (826/1312) | 60% (681/1140) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (268/592) | 44% (290/662) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (130/271) | 47% (137/291) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (954/2056) | 50% (962/1938) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) | 58% (15/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 20% (15/3) |
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Tereza Valentova
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su Jeong Jang
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Panna Udvardy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aneta Kladivova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
75 of
107)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
49%
(
44 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Julie Struplova
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
33 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Denisa Hindova
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Jana Vanik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Aneta Kladivova
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Ania Hertel
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Aneta Kladivova
75%
(
83 of
110)
1st Serve %
70%
(
80 of
114)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
49 of
80)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Aneta Kladivova
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jang Vs Kladivova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jang are available here and Kladivova photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
